Clinical features and next-generation sequencing landscape of essential thrombocythemia, prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, and overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: a Chinese monocentric retrospective study
Objective Since prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity in the 2016 revised classification of MPN differed from essential thrombocythemia (ET) or overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (overt PMF), it has been a subject of debate among experts due to its indefin...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Vol. 149; no. 6; pp. 2383 - 2392 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.06.2023
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
Since prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity in the 2016 revised classification of MPN differed from essential thrombocythemia (ET) or overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (overt PMF), it has been a subject of debate among experts due to its indefinite diagnosis.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical parameters, haematologic information, and genetic mutations of patients who were diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) according to the WHO 2016 criteria in China, including 56 ET patients, 19 pre-PMF patients, and 43 overt PMF patients.
Results
Pre-PMF patients exhibited higher leukocyte counts [14.2(6.0–28.1) × 10
9
/L vs 9.6(4.0–55.0) × 10
9
/L,
P
= 0.003], LDH values [307(233–479)U/L vs 241(129–1182)U/L,
P
< 0.001], onset ages [67(32–76) years vs 50(16–79) years, P = 0.006], a higher frequency of splenomegaly(47.4% vs 16.7%,
P
= 0.018) and hypertension (57.9 vs 23.2%,
P
= 0.005) than ET patients. On the other hand, pre-PMF patients had higher platelet counts [960(500–2245) × 10
9
/L vs 633(102–1720) × 10
9
/L,
P
= 0.017], haemoglobin levels [152(115–174)g/L vs 119(71–200)g/L,
P
= 0.003], lower LDH values [307(233–479)U/L vs 439(134–8100)U/L,
P
= 0.007] and a lower frequency of splenomegaly(47.4 vs 75.6%,
P
= 0.031) than overt PMF patients. Next-generation sequencing landscape was performed in 50 patients, revealed the frequency of
EP300
mutations was significantly increased in pre-PMF patients compared with ET and overt PMF patients (60 vs 10 vs 15.79%,
P
= 0.033), and
WT1
was more often overexpressed (
WT1/ABL1
copies ≥ 1.0%) in patients with overt PMF than in those with ET or pre-PMF(54.55 vs 16.67 vs 17.65%,
P
= 0.009). In terms of outcome, male sex, along with symptoms including MPN10, anaemia (haemoglobin < 120 g/L), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 × 10
9
/L), leucocytosis (leukocyte counts > 13 × 10
9
/L), high LDH value (> 350U/L), splenomegaly,
WT1
overexpression(
WT1/ABL1
copies ≥ 1.0%),
KMT2A
,
ASXL1
and
TP53
mutations, indicated a poor prognosis for PMF patients.
Conclusion
The results of this study indicated that a comprehensive evaluation of BM features, clinical phenotypes, haematologic parameters, and molecular profiles is needed for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of ET, pre-PMF, and overt PMF patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0171-5216 1432-1335 1432-1335 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00432-022-04067-1 |