Evaluation of question-listing at the Cancer Support Community

• Published in: Translational behavioral medicine Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 162 - 171
• Main Authors: Belkora, Jeff, Miller, Melissa, Crawford, Bonnie, Coyne, Kathleen, Stauffer, Margaret, Buzaglo, Joanne, Blakeney, Natasha, Michaels, Margo, Golant, Mitch
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer-Verlag 01.06.2013
• Subjects: Cross Cultural Psychology; Family Medicine; General Practice; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Health Psychology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Research; Public Health; Coaching; Patient participation; SCOPED; Shared decision making; Visit preparation; Professional–patient relations; Questioning
• ISSN: 1869-6716; 1613-9860
• DOI: 10.1007/s13142-012-0186-8

ABSTRACT The Cancer Support Community (CSC) provides psychosocial support to people facing cancer in community settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the compatibility, effectiveness, and fidelity of the Situation–Choices–Objectives–People–Evaluation–Decisions (SCOPED) question-listing intervention at three CSC sites. Between August 2008 and August 2011, the Program Director at each CSC site implemented question-listing, while measuring patient distress, anxiety, and self-efficacy before and after each intervention. We analyzed the quantitative results using unadjusted statistical tests and reviewed qualitative comments by patients and the case notes of Program Directors to assess compatibility and fidelity. Program Directors implemented question-listing with 77 blood cancer patients. Patients reported decreased distress ( p  = 0.009) and anxiety ( p  = 0.005) and increased self-efficacy ( p  < 0.001). Patients and Program Directors endorsed the intervention as compatible with CSC’s mission and approach and feasible to implement with high fidelity. CSC effectively translated SCOPED question-listing into practice in the context of its community-based psychosocial support services at three sites.