The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations

When remembering the past, we typically recall ‘events’ that are bounded in time and space. However, as we navigate our environment our senses receive a continuous stream of information. How do we create discrete long-term episodic memories from continuous input? Although previous research has provi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognition Vol. 154; pp. 151 - 164
Main Authors Horner, Aidan J., Bisby, James A., Wang, Aijing, Bogus, Katrina, Burgess, Neil
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.09.2016
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:When remembering the past, we typically recall ‘events’ that are bounded in time and space. However, as we navigate our environment our senses receive a continuous stream of information. How do we create discrete long-term episodic memories from continuous input? Although previous research has provided evidence for a role of spatial boundaries in the online segmentation of our sensory experience within working memory, it is not known how this segmentation contributes to subsequent long-term episodic memory. Here we show that the presence of a spatial boundary at encoding (a doorway between two rooms) impairs participants’ later ability to remember the order that objects were presented in. A sequence of two objects presented in the same room in a virtual reality environment is more accurately remembered than a sequence of two objects presented in adjoining rooms. The results are captured by a simple model in which items are associated to a context representation that changes gradually over time, and changes more rapidly when crossing a spatial boundary. We therefore provide the first evidence that the structure of long-term episodic memory is shaped by the presence of a spatial boundary and provide constraints on the nature of the interaction between working memory and long-term memory.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0010-0277
1873-7838
DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.013