Evolutionary innovation and conservation in the embryonic derivation of the vertebrate skull
Development of the vertebrate skull has been studied intensively for more than 150 years, yet many essential features remain unresolved. One such feature is the extent to which embryonic derivation of individual bones is evolutionarily conserved or labile. We perform long-term fate mapping using GFP...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature communications Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 5661 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.12.2014
Nature Publishing Group Nature Pub. Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Development of the vertebrate skull has been studied intensively for more than 150 years, yet many essential features remain unresolved. One such feature is the extent to which embryonic derivation of individual bones is evolutionarily conserved or labile. We perform long-term fate mapping using GFP-transgenic axolotl and
Xenopus laevis
to document the contribution of individual cranial neural crest streams to the osteocranium in these amphibians. Here we show that the axolotl pattern is strikingly similar to that in amniotes; it likely represents the ancestral condition for tetrapods. Unexpectedly, the pattern in
Xenopus
is much different; it may constitute a unique condition that evolved after anurans diverged from other amphibians. Such changes reveal an unappreciated relation between life history evolution and cranial development and exemplify ‘developmental system drift’, in which interspecific divergence in developmental processes that underlie homologous characters occurs with little or no concomitant change in the adult phenotype.
It is unclear whether the embryonic origin of skull bones is evolutionarily conserved. Here, the authors show that the pattern of cranial development of the Mexican axolotl is similar to that reported for other vertebrates, but the pattern in the African clawed frog, another amphibian, is unique. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors contributed equally to this work Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA |
ISSN: | 2041-1723 2041-1723 |
DOI: | 10.1038/ncomms6661 |