Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Evaluation After Initial Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Predicts Local Control in Rhabdomyosarcoma

Purpose 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is already an integral part of staging in rhabdomyosarcoma. We investigated whether primary-site treatment response characterized by serial PET imaging at specific time points can be correlated with local control. Patients and Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 84; no. 4; pp. 996 - 1002
Main Authors Dharmarajan, Kavita V., MD, Wexler, Leonard H., MD, Gavane, Somali, MD, Fox, Josef J., MD, Schoder, Heiko, MD, Tom, Ashlyn K., BS, Price, Alison N., BS, Meyers, Paul A., MD, Wolden, Suzanne L., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 15.11.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is already an integral part of staging in rhabdomyosarcoma. We investigated whether primary-site treatment response characterized by serial PET imaging at specific time points can be correlated with local control. Patients and Methods We retrospectively examined 94 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma who received initial chemotherapy 15 weeks (median) before radiotherapy and underwent baseline, preradiation, and postradiation PET. Baseline PET standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and the presence or absence of abnormal uptake (termed PET-positive or PET-negative) both before and after radiation were examined for the primary site. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was calculated according to baseline SUVmax, PET-positive status, and PET-negative status by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were tested with the log-rank test. Results The median patient age was 11 years. With 3-year median follow-up, LRFS was improved among postradiation PET-negative vs PET-positive patients: 94% vs 75%, P =.02. By contrast, on baseline PET, LRFS was not significantly different for primary-site SUVmax ≤7 vs >7 (median), although the findings suggested a trend toward improved LRFS: 96% for SUVmax ≤7 vs 79% for SUVmax >7, P =.08. Preradiation PET also suggested a statistically insignificant trend toward improved LRFS for PET-negative (97%) vs PET-positive (81%) patients ( P =.06). Conclusion Negative postradiation PET predicted improved LRFS. Notably, 77% of patients with persistent postradiation uptake did not experience local failure, suggesting that these patients could be closely followed up rather than immediately referred for intervention. Negative baseline and preradiation PET findings suggested statistically insignificant trends toward improved LRFS. Additional study may further understanding of relationships between PET findings at these time points and outcome in rhabdomyosarcoma.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.077