Ultra-processed Food Intake and Obesity: What Really Matters for Health—Processing or Nutrient Content?

Purpose of Review The aim of this narrative review was to summarize and critique recent evidence evaluating the association between ultra-processed food intake and obesity. Recent Findings Four of five studies found that higher purchases or consumption of ultra-processed food was associated with ove...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent obesity reports Vol. 6; no. 4; pp. 420 - 431
Main Authors Poti, Jennifer M., Braga, Bianca, Qin, Bo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose of Review The aim of this narrative review was to summarize and critique recent evidence evaluating the association between ultra-processed food intake and obesity. Recent Findings Four of five studies found that higher purchases or consumption of ultra-processed food was associated with overweight/obesity. Additional studies reported relationships between ultra-processed food intake and higher fasting glucose, metabolic syndrome, increases in total and LDL cholesterol, and risk of hypertension. It remains unclear whether associations can be attributed to processing itself or the nutrient content of ultra-processed foods. Only three of nine studies used a prospective design, and the potential for residual confounding was high. Summary Recent research provides fairly consistent support for the association of ultra-processed food intake with obesity and related cardiometabolic outcomes. There is a clear need for further studies, particularly those using longitudinal designs and with sufficient control for confounding, to potentially confirm these findings in different populations and to determine whether ultra-processed food consumption is associated with obesity independent of nutrient content.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2162-4968
2162-4968
DOI:10.1007/s13679-017-0285-4