The effects of zinc on the structure and functioning of a freshwater community: A microcosm experiment

A major problem with risk assessment of chemicals is the extrapolation of laboratory single‐species toxicity tests, which oversimplify the actual field situation by ignoring species interactions, to natural communities. The authors tested if the bioavailability‐normalized 5% hazardous concentration...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry Vol. 35; no. 11; pp. 2698 - 2712
Main Authors Van de Perre, Dimitri, Roessink, Ivo, Janssen, Colin R., Smolders, Erik, Van Regenmortel, Tina, Van Wichelen, Jeroen, Vyverman, Wim, Van den Brink, Paul J., De Schamphelaere, Karel A.C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A major problem with risk assessment of chemicals is the extrapolation of laboratory single‐species toxicity tests, which oversimplify the actual field situation by ignoring species interactions, to natural communities. The authors tested if the bioavailability‐normalized 5% hazardous concentration (HC5) estimated from chronic planktonic single‐species toxicity data (HC5plankton) for zinc (Zn) is protective for a plankton community and investigated the direct and indirect effects of Zn (at HC5 and HC50) on a freshwater community's structure and function. Microcosms were exposed to 3 different Zn concentrations (background, HC5plankton = 75 μg Zn/L and HC50plankton = 300 μg Zn/L) for 5 wk. The planktonic groups revealed a consistent no‐observed‐effect concentration for the community of 75 μg Zn/L, similar to or higher than the HC5plankton, thus suggesting its protectiveness in the present study. At 300 μg Zn/L a significant reduction in cladocerans resulted in increases of rotifer, ciliate, and phytoplankton abundance. In addition, the phytoplankton community shifted in dominance from grazing‐resistant to edible species. Contrary to the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) prediction, which identified phytoplankton as the most sensitive group, only the total chlorophyll and the abundance of 2 phytoplankton species were adversely affected at 300 μg Zn/L. Thus, although the HC5 estimated from the bioavailability‐normalized SSD was overall protective for the plankton community, the SSD was not able to correctly predict the species sensitivity ranking within their community context at the HC50. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2698–2712. © 2016 SETAC
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-18QT04MT-8
istex:205E3559FEF38AFDEAA10B8EE11B71DD52FBABED
Belgium Science Policy Office (Belspo; AquaStress P7/31)
ArticleID:ETC3435
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0730-7268
1552-8618
DOI:10.1002/etc.3435