Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy Retreatment in Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Metastatic cervical cancer has a poor prognosis, and treatment options are limited. Immunotherapy has been used to achieve disease control in patients with cervical cancer; however, the efficacy of immunotherapy retreatment after disease progression is unclear. This study aimed to explore the effica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOncoTargets and therapy Vol. 16; pp. 157 - 163
Main Authors Li, Guiling, Cheng, Mingxia, Hong, Kai, Jiang, Yao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dove
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Metastatic cervical cancer has a poor prognosis, and treatment options are limited. Immunotherapy has been used to achieve disease control in patients with cervical cancer; however, the efficacy of immunotherapy retreatment after disease progression is unclear. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy retreatment in metastatic cervical cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with metastatic cervical cancer who underwent immunotherapy retreatment after disease progression following previous immunotherapy from June 2019 to April 2021. Fifteen patients were included in this study. All patients received combination immunotherapy retreatment consisting of camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and apatinib. Four (26.7%) patients achieved partial response while three (20.0%) achieved stable disease. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 26.7% and 46.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.0-5.0) and 8.0 (95% confidence interval: 3.4-12.6) months, respectively. None of the patients discontinued treatment because of intolerable toxicity. Our findings suggest that the triplet combination immunotherapy retreatment could be a therapeutic option for patients with metastatic cervical cancer who failed initial immunotherapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work
ISSN:1178-6930
1178-6930
DOI:10.2147/OTT.S400376