“Stop Or I'll Shoot”: Racial Differences in Support for Police Use of Deadly Force

Based on a telephone survey of a stratified sample of 239 Cincinnati residents, we explored the impact of race on support for police use of deadly force on fleeing felons. The analysis revealed that, consistent with the standards demarcated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Tennessee v. Gamer, both Black...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 449 - 460
Main Authors CULLEN, FRANCIST T., CAO, LIQUN, FRANK, JAMES, LANGWORTHY, ROBERT H., BROWNING, SANDRA LEE, KOPACHE, RENEÉ, STEVENSON, THOMAS J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thousand Oaks SAGE Publications 01.02.1996
Sage Publications, Inc
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Based on a telephone survey of a stratified sample of 239 Cincinnati residents, we explored the impact of race on support for police use of deadly force on fleeing felons. The analysis revealed that, consistent with the standards demarcated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Tennessee v. Gamer, both Blacks' and Whites' approval of force was high when offenders manifested “past dangerousness” and was less pronounced when offenders committed nonviolent crimes. African Americans, however, were less likely than Whites to endorse the illegal use of deadly force. This attitudinal cleavage appeared to be rooted in broader racial differences in crime ideology, with Blacks being more liberal and Whites being more conservative in their views on crime and its control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0002-7642
1552-3381
DOI:10.1177/0002764296039004008