Assessing Habitat Suitability for Juvenile Atlantic Salmon in Relation to In-Stream Restoration and Discharge Variability

In‐stream restoration often aims at increasing the availability of the stream habitat suitable for salmonid fishes, thus creating potential for increased fish abundance. We assessed the success of in‐stream restoration of River Kiiminkijoki, northern Finland, by combining River2D habitat hydraulic m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRestoration ecology Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 344 - 352
Main Authors Koljonen, Saija, Huusko, Ari, Mäki-Petäys, Aki, Louhi, Pauliina, Muotka, Timo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.05.2013
Wiley
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In‐stream restoration often aims at increasing the availability of the stream habitat suitable for salmonid fishes, thus creating potential for increased fish abundance. We assessed the success of in‐stream restoration of River Kiiminkijoki, northern Finland, by combining River2D habitat hydraulic modeling and fish density monitoring at the same sites, with data from multiple restored and reference reaches for 3 years both before and after restoration. We modeled the effects of restoration on the area suitable (weighted usable area, WUA) for juvenile Atlantic salmon from post‐hatching to age‐1 fish. Wetted width in the restored reaches increased by 8.1% on average compared with only −0.2% change in the reference reaches. Habitat time series across 10 years showed significant increases in the amount of suitable habitat under summer conditions for both age‐0 and age‐1 salmon. However, improvement of overwintering habitats was marginal or nonexistent. Densities of age‐1 salmon showed no response to restoration. Low river discharge during the winter was correlated with low salmon densities the following summer. It thus appears that variability in wintertime discharge, and associated high interannual variation of WUA values, overrode the almost 20% increase in average post‐ versus pre‐restoration summertime WUA. Our study shows that the combination of hydraulic modeling and biological monitoring is a promising approach to stream restoration assessment.
Bibliography:Figure S1. Frequency distributions for dominant substratum size (Wentworth scale), water depth, and water velocity in one restored (treatment) site and one reference site (same sites as in Fig. ) in River Kiiminkijoki. White bars represent the before-restoration state, and gray bars represent the after-restoration state. Depth and velocity are classified at 10 cm and 10 cm/s intervals, respectively. All data points included.Figure S2. Same as Figure S1, but only wadeable stream areas included.
Academy of Finland
University of Oulu (Thule Institute)
ArticleID:REC908
Foundation for Research of Natural Resources in Finland
Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation
istex:6FF64863D5BF63785571D522E8A8B4B7C59D5D5E
ark:/67375/WNG-74SL2MMV-2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1061-2971
1526-100X
DOI:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00908.x