Comparison of Five Different Bone Resorption Markers in Osteosarcoma-Bearing Dogs, Normal Dogs, and Dogs with Orthopedic Diseases

• Published in: Journal of veterinary internal medicine Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 1008 - 1013
• Main Authors: Lucas, P.W, Fan, T.M, Garrett, L.D, Griffon, D.J, Wypij, J.M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.07.2008
• Subjects: Animals; Biomarkers - blood; Biomarkers - urine; bone diseases; Bone pain; bone resorption; Bone Resorption - metabolism; Canine cancer; Circulating surrogate markers; Dog Diseases - metabolism; Dogs; Female; Focal malignant osteolysis; Male; Osteoarthritis - metabolism; Osteoarthritis - veterinary; osteosarcoma; Osteosarcoma - metabolism; Osteosarcoma - veterinary
• ISSN: 0891-6640; 1939-1676
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0134.x

Background: Various bone resorption markers in humans are useful for supporting the diagnosis of malignant skeletal pathology, with certain bone resorption markers appearing to be more discriminatory for detecting cancer‐induced osteolysis than others. Canine osteosarcoma (OSA) is characterized by focal bone destruction, but a systematic investigation for determining which bone resorption marker best supports the diagnosis of OSA in dogs has not been reported. Hypothesis: Dogs with OSA will have increased concentrations of bone resorption markers compared with healthy dogs and dogs with orthopedic disorders. Differences will exist among various bone resorption markers for their ability to support the diagnosis of malignant osteolysis in dogs with OSA. Animals: Single time point, cross‐sectional, cohort study including dogs with OSA (n = 20) or orthopedic disorders (n = 20) and healthy dogs (n = 22). Methods: Basal concentrations of urine and serum N‐telopeptide (NTx), urine and serum C‐telopeptide (CTx), and urine deoxypyridinoline (DPD) were compared among all 3 groups. Results: Compared with healthy dogs and dogs with orthopedic disorders, urine NTx, serum NTx, and serum CTx concentrations were significantly increased in dogs with OSA. For urine NTx and serum NTx, the calculated lower and upper 95% confidence limits in dogs with OSA did not overlap with dogs diagnosed with orthopedic disorders or healthy dogs. Conclusions and clinical importance: Of the markers evaluated in this study, urine NTx and serum NTx appear to be the most discriminatory resorption markers supporting the diagnosis of focal malignant osteolysis in dogs with OSA.