feature-based approach to modeling protein-protein interaction hot spots

Identifying features that effectively represent the energetic contribution of an individual interface residue to the interactions between proteins remains problematic. Here, we present several new features and show that they are more effective than conventional features. By combining the proposed fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNucleic acids research Vol. 37; no. 8; pp. 2672 - 2687
Main Authors Cho, Kyu-il, Kim, Dongsup, Lee, Doheon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.05.2009
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Identifying features that effectively represent the energetic contribution of an individual interface residue to the interactions between proteins remains problematic. Here, we present several new features and show that they are more effective than conventional features. By combining the proposed features with conventional features, we develop a predictive model for interaction hot spots. Initially, 54 multifaceted features, composed of different levels of information including structure, sequence and molecular interaction information, are quantified. Then, to identify the best subset of features for predicting hot spots, feature selection is performed using a decision tree. Based on the selected features, a predictive model for hot spots is created using support vector machine (SVM) and tested on an independent test set. Our model shows better overall predictive accuracy than previous methods such as the alanine scanning methods Robetta and FOLDEF, and the knowledge-based method KFC. Subsequent analysis yields several findings about hot spots. As expected, hot spots have a larger relative surface area burial and are more hydrophobic than other residues. Unexpectedly, however, residue conservation displays a rather complicated tendency depending on the types of protein complexes, indicating that this feature is not good for identifying hot spots. Of the selected features, the weighted atomic packing density, relative surface area burial and weighted hydrophobicity are the top 3, with the weighted atomic packing density proving to be the most effective feature for predicting hot spots. Notably, we find that hot spots are closely related to π-related interactions, especially π · · · π interactions.
Bibliography:istex:6F64BE211917EB9310D4D1CCE880E9BF21BE9028
ArticleID:gkp132
ark:/67375/HXZ-SKSN828B-D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Undefined-2
ISSN:0305-1048
1362-4962
DOI:10.1093/nar/gkp132