Pharmacokinetic Simulation and Area under the Curve Estimation of Drugs Subject to Enterohepatic Circulation

Enterohepatic circulation (EHC) is a complex process where drugs undergo secretion and reabsorption from the intestinal lumen multiple times, resulting in pharmacokinetic profiles with multiple peaks. The impact of EHC on area under the curve (AUC) has been a topic of extensive debate, questioning t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmaceutics Vol. 16; no. 8; p. 1044
Main Authors Alpízar, Melchor, de Jesús Reséndiz, José, García Martínez, Elisa, Dwivedi, Sanyog, Trejo, Miguel Alejandro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 06.08.2024
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Enterohepatic circulation (EHC) is a complex process where drugs undergo secretion and reabsorption from the intestinal lumen multiple times, resulting in pharmacokinetic profiles with multiple peaks. The impact of EHC on area under the curve (AUC) has been a topic of extensive debate, questioning the suitability of conventional AUC estimation methods. Moreover, a universal model for accurately estimating AUC in EHC scenarios is lacking. To address this gap, we conducted a simulation study evaluating five empirical models under various sampling strategies to assess their performance in AUC estimation. Our results identify the most suitable model for EHC scenarios and underscore the critical role of meal-based sampling strategies in accurate AUC estimation. Additionally, we demonstrate that while the trapezoidal method performs comparably to other models with a large number of samples, alternative models are essential when sample numbers are limited. These findings not only illuminate how EHC influences AUC but also pave the way for the application of empirical models in real-world drug studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1999-4923
1999-4923
DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics16081044