Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism: Comparative study

Purpose To compare the efficacy of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating corneal astigmatism and in treating noncorneal ocular residual astigmatism. Setting Private practice, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods The records of dominant eyes of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cataract and refractive surgery Vol. 36; no. 10; pp. 1745 - 1752
Main Authors Kugler, Lance, MD, Cohen, Ilan, MD, Haddad, Walid, MD, Wang, Ming X., MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.10.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To compare the efficacy of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating corneal astigmatism and in treating noncorneal ocular residual astigmatism. Setting Private practice, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods The records of dominant eyes of consecutive patients who had LASIK were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of LASIK in eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism with the efficacy in eyes with predominantly ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). The ORA was determined by vector analysis using refractive cylinder and topographic astigmatism. Preoperatively, the ratio of ORA to preoperative refractive cylinder (R) was used to divide the patients into 2 groups; that is, eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism (ORA/R ratio <1.0) and eyes with predominantly ORA (ORA/R ratio ≥1.0). Efficacy was determined by examining the magnitude of the remaining uncorrected astigmatism and comparing the index of success (proportion of preoperative refractive astigmatism that remained uncorrected by LASIK) between the 2 groups. Results The study evaluated 61 eyes of 61 patients. Conventional LASIK was twice as efficacious in the low-ORA group as in the high-ORA group. The index of success was 0.24 and 0.50, respectively, and the difference between groups was statistically significant ( P = .036). Conclusion The efficacy of astigmatic correction by LASIK was significantly higher in eyes in which the preoperative refractive astigmatism was located mainly on the anterior corneal surface than in eyes in which it was mainly located posterior to the anterior corneal surface. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0886-3350
1873-4502
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.014