A comprehensive overview of barriers and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare: Mixed-method design

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 19; no. 8; p. e0305949
• Main Authors: Nair, Monika, Svedberg, Petra, Larsson, Ingrid, Nygren, Jens M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 09.08.2024; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Artificial Intelligence; Change management; Clinical outcomes; Content analysis; Data analysis; Data collection; Decision making; Delivery of Health Care; Ethics; Evidence-based medicine; Health care; Health Personnel; Humans; IDC; Inclusion; Leadership; Literature reviews; Machine learning; Medical personnel; Privacy; Qualitative analysis; R&D; Research & development; Research methodology; Workflow
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305949

Implementation of artificial intelligence systems for healthcare is challenging. Understanding the barriers and implementation strategies can impact their adoption and allows for better anticipation and planning. This study's objective was to create a detailed inventory of barriers to and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare to support advancements in methods and implementation processes in healthcare. A sequential explanatory mixed method design was used. Firstly, scoping reviews and systematic literature reviews were identified using PubMed. Selected studies included empirical cases of AI implementation and use in clinical practice. As the reviews were deemed insufficient to fulfil the aim of the study, data collection shifted to the primary studies included in those reviews. The primary studies were screened by title and abstract, and thereafter read in full text. Then, data on barriers to and strategies for AI implementation were extracted from the included articles, thematically coded by inductive analysis, and summarized. Subsequently, a direct qualitative content analysis of 69 interviews with healthcare leaders and healthcare professionals confirmed and added results from the literature review. Thirty-eight empirical cases from the six identified scoping and literature reviews met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Barriers to and strategies for AI implementation were grouped under three phases of implementation (planning, implementing, and sustaining the use) and were categorized into eleven concepts; Leadership, Buy-in, Change management, Engagement, Workflow, Finance and human resources, Legal, Training, Data, Evaluation and monitoring, Maintenance. Ethics emerged as a twelfth concept through qualitative analysis of the interviews. This study illustrates the inherent challenges and useful strategies in implementing AI in healthcare practice. Future research should explore various aspects of leadership, collaboration and contracts among key stakeholders, legal strategies surrounding clinicians' liability, solutions to ethical dilemmas, infrastructure for efficient integration of AI in workflows, and define decision points in the implementation process.