Risk of Early-Onset Prostate Cancer in Relation to Germ Line Polymorphisms of the Vitamin D Receptor
Vitamin D inhibits prostate cancer cell growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. These actions are mediated by the vitamin D receptor. We examined associations between prostate cancer risk and five polymorphisms in the VDR gene: four single nucleotide polymorphisms ( Fok I, Bsm I, Apa I, and Taq I rest...
Saved in:
Published in | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention Vol. 13; no. 8; pp. 1325 - 1330 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia, PA
American Association for Cancer Research
01.08.2004
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Vitamin D inhibits prostate cancer cell growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. These actions are mediated by the vitamin D
receptor. We examined associations between prostate cancer risk and five polymorphisms in the VDR gene: four single nucleotide polymorphisms ( Fok I, Bsm I, Apa I, and Taq I restriction sites) and the polyadenylic acid microsatellite. Specifically, we genotyped population-based samples of young
African Americans (113 cases and 121 controls) and Whites (232 cases and 171 controls) and members of 98 predominantly White
families with multiple cases of prostate cancer. Among Whites, there was no evidence for association between prostate cancer
risk and alleles at any of the five polymorphic sites regardless of how the men were ascertained. Moreover, estimated five-locus
haplotype frequencies were similar in White cases and controls. Among African Americans, prostate cancer risk was associated
with homozygosity for the F allele at the Fok I site (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.0-3.3). In addition, estimated haplotype frequencies differed significantly
( P < 0.01) between African American cases and controls. These findings need replication in other studies of African Americans.
Homozygosity for the F allele at the Fok I site is more prevalent in the African American population than in U.S. Whites. If the Fok I association noted here were causal, this difference could account for some of the disease burden among African Americans
and some of the excess risk in African Americans compared with Whites. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1055-9965.1325.13.8 |