Validation of the Karolinska sleepiness scale against performance and EEG variables

The Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS) is frequently used for evaluating subjective sleepiness. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the KSS with electroencephalographic, behavioral and other subjective indicators of sleepiness. Participants were 16 hea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurophysiology Vol. 117; no. 7; pp. 1574 - 1581
Main Authors Kaida, Kosuke, Takahashi, Masaya, Åkerstedt, Torbjörn, Nakata, Akinori, Otsuka, Yasumasa, Haratani, Takashi, Fukasawa, Kenji
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.07.2006
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS) is frequently used for evaluating subjective sleepiness. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the KSS with electroencephalographic, behavioral and other subjective indicators of sleepiness. Participants were 16 healthy females aged 33–43 (38.1±2.68) years. The experiment involved 8 measurement sessions per day for 3 consecutive days. Each session contained the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT), the Karolinska drowsiness test (KDT—EEG alpha & theta power), the alpha attenuation test (AAT—alpha power ratio open/closed eyes) and the KSS. Median reaction time, number of lapses, alpha and theta power density and the alpha attenuation coefficients (AAC) showed highly significant increase with increasing KSS. The same variables were also significantly correlated with KSS, with a mean value for lapses (r=0.56). The KSS was closely related to EEG and behavioral variables, indicating a high validity in measuring sleepiness. KSS ratings may be a useful proxy for EEG or behavioral indicators of sleepiness.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1388-2457
1872-8952
DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.011