Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with relined or milled CAD-CAM glass fiber posts

This in vitro study compared the fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with milled or relined glass fiber post (GFP). Seventy bovine incisors were divided into seven groups, according to the weakening protocol (none: control; medium-weakened: MW; highly-weakened: HW) and post anatomization...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDental Materials Journal Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 92 - 98
Main Authors Belizane das Graças Oliveira MAIA, Thais da Silva Alves SANTOS, CARVALHO, Cláudio Antonio Talge, VERNER, Francielle Silvestre, JUNQUEIRA, Rafael Binato
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices 25.01.2023
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This in vitro study compared the fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with milled or relined glass fiber post (GFP). Seventy bovine incisors were divided into seven groups, according to the weakening protocol (none: control; medium-weakened: MW; highly-weakened: HW) and post anatomization technique (non-relined, relined with Bulk Fill or Z350 resin; milled GFP: M). Roots were thermomechanical cycled and submitted to compression. Frequencies and groups were compared by the chi-square test and two-factor ANOVA, Tukey’s, and t-test (α=5%). The HW-M obtained the lowest values, showing significant differences compared to all groups (p<0.001). The highest value was HW-Bulk fill, with significant difference compared to MW-M (p=0.037) and HW-M (p<0.001). The frequency of repairable fractures was 100% in the control, 87%, and 63% in the MW and HW, respectively. Relined or milled GFPs can be considered to rehabilitate weakened teeth since failure patterns were predominantly repairable in all groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0287-4547
1881-1361
DOI:10.4012/dmj.2022-114