Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Risk factors and preventive methods

Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) has become widely accepted as a standard method of treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms because it enables en block resection even for large lesions or fibrotic lesions with minimal invasiveness, and decreases the local recurrence rate. Moreover,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 26; pp. 5927 - 5935
Main Authors Kataoka, Yosuke, Tsuji, Yosuke, Sakaguchi, Yoshiki, Minatsuki, Chihiro, Asada-Hirayama, Itsuko, Niimi, Keiko, Ono, Satoshi, Kodashima, Shinya, Yamamichi, Nobutake, Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro, Koike, Kazuhiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 14.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) has become widely accepted as a standard method of treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms because it enables en block resection even for large lesions or fibrotic lesions with minimal invasiveness, and decreases the local recurrence rate. Moreover, specimens resected in an en block fashion enable accurate histological assessment. Taking these factors into consideration, ESD seems to be more advantageous than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR), but the associated risks of perioperative adverse events are higher than in EMR. Bleeding after ESD is the most frequent among these adverse events. Although post-ESD bleeding can be controlled by endoscopic hemostasis in most cases, it may lead to serious conditions including hemorrhagic shock. Even with preventive methods including administration of acid secretion inhibitors and preventive hemostasis, post-ESD bleeding cannot be completely prevented. In addition high-risk cases for post-ESD bleeding, which include cases with the use of antithrombotic agents or which require large resection, are increasing. Although there have been many reports about associated risk factors and methods of preventing post-ESD bleeding, many issues remain unsolved. Therefore, in this review, we have overviewed risk factors and methods of preventing post-ESD bleeding from previous studies. Endoscopists should have sufficient knowledge of these risk factors and preventive methods when performing ESD.
Bibliography:Yosuke Kataoka;Yosuke Tsuji;Yoshiki Sakaguchi;Chihiro Minatsuki;Itsuko Asada-Hirayama;Keiko Niimi;Satoshi Ono;Shinya Kodashima;Nobutake Yamamichi;Mitsuhiro Fujishiro;Kazuhiko Koike;Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo;Center for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo;Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Correspondence to: Yosuke Tsuji, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. ytsuji-tky@umin.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-3-38155411 Fax: +81-3-58009522
Author contributions: Kataoka Y and Tsuji Y contributed to the literature review and manuscript writing; Koike K gave the final approval of the manuscript; All the other authors checked the manuscript and suggested improvement.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5927