Femoral stem size mismatch in women undergoing total hip arthroplasty

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedics Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 293 - 296
• Main Authors: Dundon, John M, Felberbaum, Dvorah Leah, Long, William J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd 01.06.2018; Elsevier
• Subjects: Femoral sizing; Orthopedics; Periprosthetic fracture; Total hip arhtroplasty; Women; Women; Femoral sizing; Total hip arhtroplasty; Periprosthetic fracture
• ISSN: 0972-978X; 0972-978X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.02.002

Abstract Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful surgery with a high prevalence in women. Women have been noted to have smaller proximal femoral anatomy and decreased bone strength compared to males. The goal of our study was to define the size discrepancy in femoral stem implants between men and women using a metaphyseal fitting single taper stem. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the THA’s performed by a single surgeon over the previous two years. Data was extracted from operative reports regarding stem size, neck length and offset, and conversion to a different type of stem. This data was reviewed with confidence intervals and a t -test was performed for independent samples with a p < 0.05 being determined significant. Results We analyzed the data from 276 THA’s performed (129 in men, and 147 in women). Women were noted to be associated with smaller stem sizes compared to men (37.67% in women, 6.11% in men), with 7.48% of women requiring conversion to a different type of implant. There was a significant difference in mean stem size (9.21 in men, 6.70 in women, p < 0.0001). Women also required reduced neck options significantly more often than men (38.97% in women, 9.29% in men, p < 0.0001). Conclusion Review of femoral stem sizes reveals that current femoral stem sizing may not appropriately account for women and alternative stem options should be available if using a metaphyseal fitting single tapered stems. Future consideration should be given to more anatomic female sized femoral stems or alternative options should be available.