Intradermal testing increases the accuracy of an immediate-type cefaclor hypersensitivity diagnosis

• Published in: The World Allergy Organization journal Vol. 15; no. 4; p. 100643
• Main Authors: Lee, Ji-Hyang, Park, Chan Sun, Pyo, Min Ju, Ryang Lee, A., Shin, Eunyong, Yoo, Young-Sang, Song, Woo-Jung, Kim, Tae-Bum, Cho, You-Sook, Kwon, Hyouk-Soo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2022; Elsevier BV; World Allergy Organization; Elsevier
• Subjects: Allergies; Anaphylaxis; Antibiotics; Beta-lactams; Cefaclor; Cephalosporins; Diagnostic accuracy; Drug dosages; Drug provocation test; Erythema; Full-length; Histamine; IgE quantification; Immediate hypersensitivity; Intradermal skin test; Medical diagnosis; Intradermal skin test; Cephalosporins; Beta-lactams; Diagnostic accuracy; Drug provocation test; IgE quantification; Immediate hypersensitivity; Cefaclor
• ISSN: 1939-4551; 1939-4551
• DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100643

Hypersensitivity reactions to cefaclor have increased in accordance with its frequent use. However, only limited data are available on the diagnostic value of skin tests for these conditions, particularly intradermal tests (IDTs). To evaluate the clinical usefulness of IDT compared to the ImmunoCAP test in patients with cefaclor-induced immediate-type hypersensitivity. We conducted a retrospective chart review from January 2010 to June 2020 of adult subjects from 2 tertiary hospitals in Korea with a history of suspected immediate-type hypersensitivity to cefaclor, and who had undergone ImmunoCAP and IDT. Overall, 131 subjects diagnosed with cefaclor hypersensitivity were included in the analysis. Fifty-nine patients (59/131, 45.04%) were positive in both IDT and ImmunoCAP. Fifty-four (54/131, 41.22%) and 6 (6/131, 4.58%) subjects showed positive results only with IDT or the ImmunoCAP test, respectively. Twelve subjects (12/131, 9.16%) were negative by both tests but reacted positively in a drug provocation test. The frequency of IDT positivity was similar regardless of the severity of reactions. However, positivity of ImmunoCAP was lower in subjects with mild reactions compared to those with anaphylaxis. Regarding the diagnosis of cefaclor hypersensitivity, the overall sensitivity of IDT and ImmunoCAP was 0.863 and 0.496, respectively while the specificity was 1. The combination of IDT and ImmunoCAP further increased this sensitivity to 0.908. IDT was more sensitive than ImmunoCAP for the diagnosis of cefaclor allergy, regardless of the severity of the hypersensitivity reaction. Therefore, we recommend a combination of IDT and ImmunoCAP for the diagnosis of cefaclor hypersensitivity.