Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia: A multicenter Middle Eastern experience

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was proposed in 2010 as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of achalasia. In this article, we describe the Middle Eastern experience with the procedure in terms of efficacy, length of admission, and short- and long-term complications. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSaudi journal of gastroenterology Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 74 - 79
Main Authors Al Lehibi, Abed, Elkholy, Shaimaa, Gouda, Mohamed, Al Dabbagh, Ammar, Al Balkhi, Areej, Almtawa, Abdullah, Al Otaibi, Nawwaf, El-Sherbiny, Mohammed, Essam, Kareem, Alzahrani, Mohammed, Al Ghamdi, Ahmed, Al Ghamdi, Adel, AlEid, Ahmad, Qutub, Adel, Alamr, Abdulrahman, Ahmad, Shameem, Al Sayari, Khalid, Al Ibrahim, Bashaar, Al Khathlan, Abdullah, Alkhiari, Resheed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01.01.2022
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was proposed in 2010 as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of achalasia. In this article, we describe the Middle Eastern experience with the procedure in terms of efficacy, length of admission, and short- and long-term complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected data on patients who underwent a POEM procedure was conducted between March 2019 and May 2020. The primary outcome was clinical success rate, defined as a postprocedure Eckardt score ≤3 at ≥3 months. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, presence of reflux symptoms or need for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) ≥3 months, and adverse events. Results: During the study period, 67 patients (35 females) underwent the procedure for achalasia. The participants' ages ranged from 11 to 80 years (mean 41 ± 18 years). Eckardt scores before the treatment ranged between 4 and 12 (mean 8.85 ± 1.75). Sixty-four patients (95.5%) achieved Eckardt scores of ≤3 at ≥3 months after the procedure (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%-100%). The difference between pre- and post-procedural Eckardt scores averaged around -8 points (95% CI: −7.5 to -8.5 P < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported in 24 patients (35.8%) and included pneumoperitoneum (32.8%), reflux symptoms at 3 months (29.9%), and surgical emphysema (3%). Six patients had adverse events that led to prolongation of admission; 3% of whom had aspiration pneumonia, 3% had pneumoperitoneum, 1.5% had both, and 1.5% had an esophageal tear. Conclusions: POEM is a promising procedure for the treatment of achalasia with a high clinical success rate, short hospital admission, and a reassuring safety profile.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1319-3767
1998-4049
1998-4049
DOI:10.4103/sjg.sjg_49_21