Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy

How does organizational slack affect firm performance? Organization theory posits that slack, despite its costs, has a positive impact on firm performance. In contrast, agency theory suggests that slack breeds inefficiency and inhibits performance. The empirical evidence, largely from developed econ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStrategic management journal Vol. 24; no. 13; pp. 1249 - 1263
Main Authors Tan, Justin, Peng, Mike W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.12.2003
John Wiley and Sons
Wiley
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:How does organizational slack affect firm performance? Organization theory posits that slack, despite its costs, has a positive impact on firm performance. In contrast, agency theory suggests that slack breeds inefficiency and inhibits performance. The empirical evidence, largely from developed economies, has been inconclusive. Moreover, little effort has been made to empirically test whether such an impact (positive or negative) is linear or curvilinear. This article joins the debate by extending empirical work to the largely unexplored context of economic transitions. Specifically, two studies, based on survey and archival data (N = 57 and 1532 firms, respectively), are undertaken in China's emerging economy. Our results suggest (1) that organization theory generates stronger predictions when dealing with unabsorbed slack, and (2) that agency theory yields stronger validity when focusing on absorbed slack. Furthermore, we also find that the impact of slack on performance is curvilinear, which resembles inverse U-shaped curves. Overall, our findings call for a contingency perspective to specify the nature of slack when discussing its impact on firm performance.
Bibliography:istex:44CDFFC87B1827DA52B0F72FDE30A497526D75A6
ark:/67375/WNG-LMVNSRSJ-G
ArticleID:SMJ351
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0143-2095
1097-0266
DOI:10.1002/smj.351