On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research
This study sought to determine the accuracy of geocoding for public health databases. A test file of 70 addresses, 50 of which involved errors, was generated, and the file was geocoded to the census tract and block group levels by 4 commercial geocoding firms. Also, the "real world" accura...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of public health (1971) Vol. 91; no. 7; pp. 1114 - 1116 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington, DC
Am Public Health Assoc
01.07.2001
American Public Health Association |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study sought to determine the accuracy of geocoding for public health databases.
A test file of 70 addresses, 50 of which involved errors, was generated, and the file was geocoded to the census tract and block group levels by 4 commercial geocoding firms. Also, the "real world" accuracy of the best-performing firm was evaluated.
Accuracy rates in regard to geocoding of the test file ranged from 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 32%, 56%) to 84% (95% CI = 73%, 92%). The geocoding firm identified as having the best accuracy rate correctly geocoded 96% of the addresses obtained from the public health databases.
Public health studies involving geocoded databases should evaluate and report on methods used to verify accuracy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
DOI: | 10.2105/AJPH.91.7.1114 |