Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging

• Published in: The Journal of urology Vol. 179; no. 5; p. 1907
• Main Authors: Nguyen, Lang, Jhaveri, Jay, Tewari, Ashutosh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2008
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatectomy - adverse effects; Prostatectomy - methods; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery; Robotics; Urethra - pathology; Urethra - surgery; Urinary Incontinence - etiology; Urinary Incontinence - prevention & control
• ISSN: 1527-3792
• DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.036

Shorter urethral sphincter length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has been associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary incontinence as well as longer time to achieve continence. We determined that our techniques of anatomical reconstruction for restoring the continence mechanism could markedly improve continence outcomes, especially in patients with a shorter urethral sphincter. Our cohort consisted of 274 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy, as performed by a single surgeon, and for whom preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative evaluations were available. All sphincter lengths were measured on T2-weighted images as the distance from the prostatic apex to the penile bulb, cross-referencing all 3 planes. Continence was defined as zero pads or a liner used for security reasons only. The 2 surgical modifications considerably hastened the return of continence at 6 months. The continence rate in the shorter sphincter group (less than 14 mm) was 47% for the control technique, 81% for anterior reconstruction and 90% for total reconstruction. The continence rate in the longer sphincter group (more than 14 mm) was 80% for the control technique and 83% for anterior reconstruction, while it approached 99% for total reconstruction. With the control technique the average time to achieve continence was significantly different between the shorter and longer sphincter groups (25 vs 12 weeks, p = 0.037). The significance disappeared for anterior reconstruction (7.4 vs 6.2 weeks, p = 0.27) and total reconstruction (3.6 vs 2.7 weeks, p = 0.13). The results of this study are encouraging for patients with a short urethral sphincter who are considering radical prostatectomy.