A machine learning model based on ultrasound image features to assess the risk of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: Applications of scikit-learn and SHAP

Background This study aimed to determine an optimal machine learning (ML) model for evaluating the preoperative diagnostic value of ultrasound signs of breast cancer lesions for sentinel lymph node (SLN) status. Method This study retrospectively analyzed the ultrasound images and postoperative patho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 944569
Main Authors Zhang, Gaosen, Shi, Yan, Yin, Peipei, Liu, Feifei, Fang, Yi, Li, Xiang, Zhang, Qingyu, Zhang, Zhen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 25.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background This study aimed to determine an optimal machine learning (ML) model for evaluating the preoperative diagnostic value of ultrasound signs of breast cancer lesions for sentinel lymph node (SLN) status. Method This study retrospectively analyzed the ultrasound images and postoperative pathological findings of lesions in 952 breast cancer patients. Firstly, the univariate analysis of the relationship between the ultrasonographic features of breast cancer morphological features and SLN metastasis. Then, based on the ultrasound signs of breast cancer lesions, we screened ten ML models: support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), logistic regression (LR), naive bayesian model (NB), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), multilayer perceptron (MLP), long short-term memory (LSTM), and convolutional neural network (CNN). The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), Kappa value, accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity. Then we constructed a clinical prediction model which was based on the ML algorithm with the best diagnostic performance. Finally, we used SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) to visualize and analyze the diagnostic process of the ML model. Results Of 952 patients with breast cancer, 394 (41.4%) had SLN metastasis, and 558 (58.6%) had no metastasis. Univariate analysis found that the shape, orientation, margin, posterior features, calculations, architectural distortion, duct changes and suspicious lymph node of breast cancer lesions in ultrasound signs were associated with SLN metastasis. Among the 10 ML algorithms, XGBoost had the best comprehensive diagnostic performance for SLN metastasis, with Average-AUC of 0.952, Average-Kappa of 0.763, and Average-Accuracy of 0.891. The AUC of the XGBoost model in the validation cohort was 0.916, the accuracy was 0.846, the sensitivity was 0.870, the specificity was 0.862, and the F1-score was 0.826. The diagnostic performance of the XGBoost model was significantly higher than that of experienced radiologists in some cases (P<0.001). Using SHAP to visualize the interpretation of the ML model screen, it was found that the ultrasonic detection of suspicious lymph nodes, microcalcifications in the primary tumor, burrs on the edge of the primary tumor, and distortion of the tissue structure around the lesion contributed greatly to the diagnostic performance of the XGBoost model. Conclusions The XGBoost model based on the ultrasound signs of the primary breast tumor and its surrounding tissues and lymph nodes has a high diagnostic performance for predicting SLN metastasis. Visual explanation using SHAP made it an effective tool for guiding clinical courses preoperatively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Breast Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Edited by: Nosheen Masood, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Pakistan
Reviewed by: Prasannavenkatesan Theerthagiri, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM), India; Abdulhamit Subasi, University of Turku, Finland; Pawel Zyblewski, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.944569