Evaluation and Pharmacologic Management of Symptoms in Cancer Patients Undergoing Acute Rehabilitation in a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Abstract Guo Y, Young BL, Hainley S, Palmer JL, Bruera E. Evaluation and pharmacologic management of symptoms in cancer patients undergoing acute rehabilitation in a comprehensive cancer center. Objectives To identify cancer patients’ symptoms at admission and on discharge from an acute rehabilitati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 88; no. 7; pp. 891 - 895
Main Authors Guo, Ying, MD, Young, Beth L., APN, Hainley, Susan, APN, Palmer, J. Lynn, PhD, Bruera, Eduardo, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.07.2007
Elsevier
Subjects
Age
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Guo Y, Young BL, Hainley S, Palmer JL, Bruera E. Evaluation and pharmacologic management of symptoms in cancer patients undergoing acute rehabilitation in a comprehensive cancer center. Objectives To identify cancer patients’ symptoms at admission and on discharge from an acute rehabilitation unit, to document the discharge medications used for symptom management, and to assess how symptoms affect lengths of stay (LOS). Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Acute inpatient rehabilitation unit within a tertiary cancer center. Participants Ninety-six patients (49 men, 47 women) were admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation unit. The median age was 64 years (range, 26–87y). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) scores at admission and on discharge. Results The most intense symptom (mean ESAS visual analog scale score ± standard deviation) on admission was poor appetite (3.7±3.3), followed by fatigue (3.4±2.6). Similar results were found for the 63 patients with ESAS scores available at both time points. On discharge, poor appetite (2.2±2.4) was still the most intense symptom reported, again followed by fatigue (2.2±2.1). There were significant improvements in anxiety ( P =.001), constipation ( P =.001), fatigue ( P =.002), pain ( P =.003), appetite ( P =.004), sense of well-being ( P =.01), and insomnia ( P =.04). Seventy percent (65/93) of patients received discharge prescriptions for symptom control, with analgesics being the most frequently prescribed. The poor appetite and depression admission scores correlated positively with hospital LOS ( P <.001, P =.05, respectively). Conclusions Assessment of symptoms revealed significant symptom burdens in cancer patients undergoing rehabilitation. Pharmacologic interventions for management of symptoms were frequently needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.032