ELISA- and Activity Assay-Based Quantification of BMP-2 Released In Vitro Can Be Biased by Solubility in "Physiological" Buffers and an Interfering Effect of Chitosan

Chitosan nanogel-coated polycaprolactone (PCL) fiber mat-based implant prototypes with tailored release of bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2) are a promising approach to achieve implant-mediated bone regeneration. In order to ensure reliable release results, the robustness of a commercially availabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmaceutics Vol. 13; no. 4; p. 582
Main Authors Sundermann, Julius, Sydow, Steffen, Burmeister, Laura, Hoffmann, Andrea, Menzel, Henning, Bunjes, Heike
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 19.04.2021
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Chitosan nanogel-coated polycaprolactone (PCL) fiber mat-based implant prototypes with tailored release of bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2) are a promising approach to achieve implant-mediated bone regeneration. In order to ensure reliable release results, the robustness of a commercially available ELISA for -derived BMP-2 and the parallel determination of BMP-2 recovery using a quantitative biological activity assay were investigated within a common release setup, with special reference to solubility and matrix effects. Without bovine serum albumin and Tween 20 as solubilizing additives to release media buffed at physiological pH, BMP-2 recoveries after release were notably reduced. In contrast, the addition of chitosan to release samples caused an excessive recovery. A possible explanation for these effects is the reversible aggregation tendency of BMP-2, which might be influenced by an interaction with chitosan. The interfering effects highlighted in this study are of great importance for bio-assay-based BMP-2 quantification, especially in the context of pharmaceutical release experiments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1999-4923
1999-4923
DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics13040582