The Influence of Equipment Design and Process Parameters on Granule Breakage in a Semi-Continuous Fluid Bed Dryer after Continuous Twin-Screw Wet Granulation

• Published in: Pharmaceutics Vol. 13; no. 2; p. 293
• Main Authors: Ryckaert, Alexander, Ghijs, Michael, Portier, Christoph, Djuric, Dejan, Funke, Adrian, Vervaet, Chris, De Beer, Thomas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 23.02.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: continuous manufacturing; Design; fluid bed drying; Investigations; Manufacturing; Moisture content; particle size distribution; Pharmaceutical industry; process understanding; twin-screw granulation; Belgium; United States > US; Switzerland; Germany; twin-screw granulation; granules; process understanding; continuous manufacturing; particle size distribution; fluid bed drying; moisture content
• ISSN: 1999-4923; 1999-4923
• DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020293

The drying unit of a continuous from-powder-to-tablet manufacturing line based on twin-screw granulation (TSG) is a crucial intermediate process step to achieve the desired tablet quality. Understanding the size reduction of pharmaceutical granules before, during, and after the fluid bed drying process is, however, still lacking. A first major goal was to investigate the breakage and attrition phenomena during transport of wet and dry granules, the filling phase, and drying phase on a ConsiGma-25 system (C25). Pneumatic transport of the wet granules after TSG towards the dryer induced extensive breakage, whereas the turbulent filling and drying phase of the drying cells caused rather moderate breakage and attrition. Subsequently, the dry transfer line was responsible for additional extensive breakage and attrition. The second major goal was to compare the influence of drying air temperature and drying time on granule size and moisture content for granules processed with a commercial-scale ConsiGma-25 system and with the R&D-scale ConsiGma-1 (C1) system. Generally, the granule quality obtained after drying with C1 was not predictive for the C25, making it challenging during process development with the C1 to obtain representative granules for the C25.