Effects of dietary intervention and n-3 PUFA supplementation on markers of gut-related inflammation and their association with cardiovascular events in a high-risk population

Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is associated with increased levels of circulating lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and subsequent activation of systemic inflammation. Diet is an important modulator of the gut microbiome. We aimed to investigate whether circulating markers of gut-related inflammation, LPS b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAtherosclerosis Vol. 286; pp. 53 - 59
Main Authors Awoyemi, Ayodeji, Trøseid, Marius, Arnesen, Harald, Solheim, Svein, Seljeflot, Ingebjørg
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.07.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is associated with increased levels of circulating lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and subsequent activation of systemic inflammation. Diet is an important modulator of the gut microbiome. We aimed to investigate whether circulating markers of gut-related inflammation, LPS binding protein (LBP) and soluble CD14 (sCD14) can be modulated by n-3 PUFA supplementation and/or diet counselling, and whether these markers are related to cardiovascular (CV) outcome. 484 men aged 65–75 years, at high CV-risk, were included and randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to 36-month intervention with dietary counselling, n-3 PUFA supplementation, or both. N-3 PUFA supplementation was placebo-controlled. ELISAs were used for determination of the biomarkers measured at baseline and study-end. A composite endpoint was defined as new CV-events and CV-mortality after 36 months. There were no significant differences in changes of either LBP or sCD14 in the intervention groups compared to their respective controls (n-3 PUFA vs. placebo: p = 0.58, p = 0.15, diet vs. no-diet: p = 0.53, p = 0.59, respectively). The group with LBP levels above median had about 2-fold unadjusted risk of suffering an endpoint compared to the group below (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.25–3.96; p = 0.01). A similar tendency was seen for sCD14 (HR 1.72, 95% CI 0.97–3.03; p = 0.06). After adjusting for covariates, LBP remained significantly associated with a two-fold CV-risk, whereas sCD14 gained statistical significance, however, lost when hsCRP was added to the model. In our population, markers of gut-related inflammation associated with 36-month CV outcome. However, neither n-3 PUFA nor diet intervention had an effect on these markers. [Display omitted] •Markers of gut-related inflammation are not affected by diet intervention.•LBP and sCD14 are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease.•LBP predicts increased risk of cardiovascular disease independent of CRP.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9150
1879-1484
DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.05.004