Causes for the declining proportion of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract Aims The reported proportion of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has declined worldwide. VF decline may be caused by less VF at collapse and/or faster dissolution of VF into asystole. We aimed to determine the causes of VF decline by comparing VF propor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResuscitation Vol. 96; pp. 23 - 29
Main Authors Hulleman, Michiel, Zijlstra, Jolande A, Beesems, Stefanie G, Blom, Marieke T, van Hoeijen, Daniel A, Waalewijn, Reinier A, Tan, Hanno L, Tijssen, Jan G.P, Koster, Rudolph W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Aims The reported proportion of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has declined worldwide. VF decline may be caused by less VF at collapse and/or faster dissolution of VF into asystole. We aimed to determine the causes of VF decline by comparing VF proportions in relation to delay from emergency medical services (EMS) call to initial ECG (call-to-ECG delay), and VF dissolution rates between two study periods. Methods Data from the AmsteRdam REsuscitation STudies (ARREST), an ongoing OHCA registry in the Netherlands, were used. We studied cardiac OHCA in the study periods 1995–1997 ( n = 917) and 2006–2012 ( n = 5695). Cases with available ECG and information on call-to-ECG delay were included. We tested whether initial VF proportion and VF dissolution rates differed between both study periods using logistic regression. Results Despite a 15% VF decline between the periods, VF proportion around EMS call remained high in 2006–2012 (64%). The odds ratio (OR) for VF proportion in 2006–2012 vs. 1995–1997 was 0.52 (95%-CI 0.45–0.60, P < 0.001), with similar rates of VF dissolution in both periods ( P = 0.83). VF decline was higher for unwitnessed collapse (OR 0.41, 95%-CI 0.28–0.58) and collapse at home (OR 0.50, 95%-CI 0.42–0.59), but not for categories of bystander CPR, age or sex. Conclusion VF proportion early after collapse remains high. VF decline is explained by the occurrence of less initial VF, rather than faster dissolving VF. An increase in unwitnessed OHCA and collapse at home contributes to the observed VF decline.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.010