Bone Mineral Density and Fractures in Antiretroviral-Naive Persons Randomized to Receive Abacavir-Lamivudine or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate-Emtricitabine Along With Efavirenz or Atazanavir-Ritonavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a Substudy of ACTG A5202

Background. Long-term effects of abacavir (ABC)-lamivudine (3TC), compared with tenofovir (TDF)-emtricitabine (FTC) with efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV/r), on bone mineral density (BMD) have not been analyzed. Methods. A5224s was a substudy of A5202, in which HIV-infected treatmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 203; no. 12; pp. 1791 - 1801
Main Authors McComsey, Grace A., Kitch, Douglas, Daar, Eric S., Tierney, Camlin, Jahed, Nasreen C., Tebas, Pablo, Myers, Laurie, Melbourne, Kathleen, Ha, Belinda, Sax, Paul E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 15.06.2011
SeriesEditor's Choice
Subjects
Arm
Hip
RNA
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. Long-term effects of abacavir (ABC)-lamivudine (3TC), compared with tenofovir (TDF)-emtricitabine (FTC) with efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV/r), on bone mineral density (BMD) have not been analyzed. Methods. A5224s was a substudy of A5202, in which HIV-infected treatment-naive participants were randomized and blinded to receive ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC with open-label EFV or ATV/r. Primary bone end points included Dual-emission X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA)-measured percent changes in spine and hip BMD at week 96. Primary analyses were intent-to-treat. Statistical tests used the factorial design and included linear regression, 2-sample t, log-rank, and Fisher's exact tests. Results. Two hundred sixty-nine persons randomized to 4 arms of ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC with EFV or ATV/r. At baseline, 85% were male, and 47% were white non- Hispanic; the median HIV-1 RNA load was 4.6 log₁₀ copies/ML, the median age was 38 years, the median weight was 76 kg, and the median CD4 cell count was 233 cells/μL. At week 96, the mean percentage changes from baseline in spine and hip BMD for ABC-3TC versus TDF-FTC were -1.3% and -3.3% (P = .004) and -2.6% and -4.0% (P = .024), respectively; and for EFV versus ATV/r were -1.7% and -3.1% (P = .035) and -3.1% and -3.4% (P = .61), respectively. Bone fracture was observed in 5.6% of participants. The probability of bone fractures and time to first fracture were not different across components. Conclusions. Compared with ABC-3TC, TDF-FTC-treated participants had significantly greater decreases in spine and hip BMD, whereas ATV/r led to more significant losses in spine, but not hip, BMD than EFV. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00118898.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Potential conflicts of interest: GAM has served as a scientific advisor for Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott, and Gilead Sciences; has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott, Merck, and Gilead Sciences; and has served as the DSMB Chair for a Pfizer-sponsored study. ESD has served as a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and ViiV and has received research grant support from Abbott Laboratories, Merck, and Pfizer. C. T. has been a member of a DSMB for Tibotec. P. T. has served as a consultant for Merck, Tibotec, Pfizer, and BMS. K. M. has been an employee of Gilead Sciences and owns stock in Gilead Sciences. B. H. has been an employee of GlaxoSmithKline. PS has served as a consultant for Abbott, BMS, Gilead, GSK, Merck, Tibotec, and ViiV and has received grant support from Gilead, Merck, and Tibotec. All other authors: no conflicts.
Presented in part: 17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, February 2010, San Francisco, CA.
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir188