Estimated portion sizes of snacks and beverages differ from reference amounts and are affected by appetite status in non-obese men

Objective To explore the extent to which appetite status influences portion size estimation in men under laboratory conditions and to quantify how much participants' portion estimates differed from the recommended portion sizes defined by authoritative bodies (i.e. government and health profess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic health nutrition Vol. 14; no. 10; pp. 1743 - 1751
Main Authors Brogden, Nina, Almiron-Roig, Eva
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.10.2011
CABI Pub. on behalf of the Nutrition Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1368-9800
1475-2727
1475-2727
DOI10.1017/S1368980011000528

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To explore the extent to which appetite status influences portion size estimation in men under laboratory conditions and to quantify how much participants' portion estimates differed from the recommended portion sizes defined by authoritative bodies (i.e. government and health professionals’ reference amounts). Design Repeated, randomized cross-over trial with each participant attending the laboratory on four separate occasions. At each session, participants rated the number of portions of eight foods and beverages displayed in front of them. Participants rated portions twice after consuming breakfast (full conditions) and twice after an overnight fast (hungry conditions). Portion estimates were compared with reference amounts from the British and American Dietetic Associations, from the UK Food Standards Agency and from the US Food and Drug Administration. Setting Food skills laboratory, University of Chester, UK. Subjects Twenty-seven non-obese men (mean age 24·9 (sd 6·5) years). Results Portion size estimates for all items were significantly smaller under hungry than under full conditions (P < 0·01). Relative to reference instruments, estimates were significantly smaller for all foods except banana, irrespective of appetite status (P < 0·001). Conclusions In this data set, appetite status altered the perception of food amounts. There were large discrepancies between participants' perception of a portion and recommendations from health professionals and government standards. Nutritional educational strategies should take into account the role of hunger along with a person's familiarity with existing portion size systems when advising on portion sizes.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980011000528
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1368-9800
1475-2727
1475-2727
DOI:10.1017/S1368980011000528