A reconstruction of the gender agenda The contradictory gender dimensions in New Labour's educational and economic policy

This article reviews current interpretations of Labour's education policy in relation to gender. Such interpretations see the marginalisation of gender equality in mainstream educational policy as a result of the discursive shift from egalitarianism to that of performativity. Performativity in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOxford review of education Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 173 - 189
Main Authors Arnot, Madeleine, Miles, Philip
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Taylor and Francis Ltd 01.03.2005
Carfax Publishing
Taylor & Francis Group Journals
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article reviews current interpretations of Labour's education policy in relation to gender. Such interpretations see the marginalisation of gender equality in mainstream educational policy as a result of the discursive shift from egalitarianism to that of performativity. Performativity in the school context is shown to have contradictory elements ranging from an increased feminisation of teaching and the (re)masculinisation of schooling. Also, whilst underachievement is defined as 'the problem of boys', the production of hierarchical masculinities and 'laddishness' by marketised schools is ignored. The policy shift towards performativity also masks girls' exclusion and the disadvantages working-class girls face within the education system. The rhetoric of gender equality, although stronger in the field of post-16 training and employment, is no less contradictory. The effects of New Labour are found in the aggravation of social class divisions within gender categories and the spiralling differences between male and female paths. Gender equality ideals in education are therefore shown to have a far more complex relationship to New Labour politics than previously thought. (DIPF/Orig.).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0305-4985
1465-3915
DOI:10.1080/0305498042000337255