Controlled release of biologics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is a rapidly growing disease that poses a significant burden to the United States healthcare system. Despite the many available treatments for the disease, close to half of diagnosed type 2 diabetes cases are not properly managed, largely due to inadequate patient adherence to prescr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of controlled release Vol. 240; pp. 151 - 164
Main Authors Gilroy, Caslin A., Luginbuhl, Kelli M., Chilkoti, Ashutosh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 28.10.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Type 2 diabetes is a rapidly growing disease that poses a significant burden to the United States healthcare system. Despite the many available treatments for the disease, close to half of diagnosed type 2 diabetes cases are not properly managed, largely due to inadequate patient adherence to prescribed treatment regimens. Methods for improving delivery — and thereby easing administration — of type 2 drugs have the potential to greatly improve patient health. This review focuses on two peptide drugs — insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) — for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Peptide drugs offer the benefits of high potency and specificity but pose a significant delivery challenge due to their inherent instability and short half-life. The development of insulin and GLP-1 analogs highlights the broad spectrum of drug delivery strategies that have been used to solve these problems. Numerous structural modifications and formulations have been introduced to optimize absorption, residence time, stability, route of delivery and frequency of administration. Continual improvements in delivery methods for insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonists are paving the way towards better patient compliance and improved disease management, and thereby enhanced patient quality of life. [Display omitted]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ISSN:0168-3659
1873-4995
DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.002