Left-sided vagus nerve stimulation improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in rats as effectively as right-sided vagus nerve stimulation

BACKGROUND: Our group previously reported that right-sided vagus nerve stimulation (RVNS) significantly improved outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a rat model of cardiac arrest (CA). However, whether left-sided vagus nerve stimulation (LVNS) could achieve the same effect as RVNS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of emergency medicine Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 309 - 316
Main Authors Shao, Wei-jing, Shu, Ting-ting, Xu, Shuang, Liang, Li-cai, Grange, Jehane Michael Le, Zhou, Yu-ran, Huang, He, Cai, Yu, Zhang, Qing, Sun, Peng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hangzhou World Journal of Emergency Medicine 01.01.2021
World Journal of Emergency Medicine (WJEM)
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND: Our group previously reported that right-sided vagus nerve stimulation (RVNS) significantly improved outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a rat model of cardiac arrest (CA). However, whether left-sided vagus nerve stimulation (LVNS) could achieve the same effect as RVNS in CPR outcomes remains unknown. METHODS: A rat model of CA was established using modified percutaneous epicardial electrical stimulation to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF). Rats were treated with LVNS or RVNS for 30 minutes before the induction of VF. All animals were observed closely within 72 hours after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and their health and behavior were evaluated every 24 hours. RESULTS: Compared with those in the RVNS group, the hemodynamic measurements in the LVNS group decreased more notably. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) decreased the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-[alpha]) and the arrhythmia score, and attenuated inflammatory infiltration in myocardial tissue after ROSC, regardless of the side of stimulation, compared with findings in the CPR group. Both LVNS and RVNS ameliorated myocardial function and increased the expression of [alpha]-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in the myocardium after ROSC. Moreover, a clear improvement in 72-hour survival was shown with VNS pre-treatment, with no significant difference in efficacy when comparing the laterality of stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: LVNS may have similar effects as RVNS on improving outcomes after CPR. KEYWORDS: Vagus nerve stimulation; Cardiac arrest; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Myocardial function; [alpha]-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1920-8642
DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.04.010