PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the appropriateness and utility of tools used to assess the risk of violent radicalization.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCampbell systematic review Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. e1279 - n/a
Main Authors Hassan, Ghayda, Brouillette‐Alarie, Sébastien, Ousman, Sarah, Madriaza, Pablo, Varela, Wynnpaul, Danis, Emmanuel, Kilinc, Deniz, Pickup, David, Borokhovski, Eugene
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.12.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Capacity Building
Coding
Content Validity
Control Groups
Correctional treatment programs
Criminals
Criminology
Effect Size
Evaluative Thinking
Evaluators
Extremism
Group Activities
Iatrogenesis
Intervention
Medical Evaluation
Mental health
Meta Analysis
Personality Traits
Predictive Validity
Professionals
Protocol
Psychology
Radicalism
Recidivism
Resistance (Psychology)
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Surveillance
Systematic review
Terrorism
Validation studies
Validity
Violence
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the appropriateness and utility of tools used to assess the risk of violent radicalization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1891-1803
1891-1803
DOI:10.1002/cl2.1279