AN EMPIRICAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN APPROPRIATE INTERVAL LENGTH FOR RECORDING BEHAVIOR

• Published in: Journal of applied behavior analysis Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 493 - 500
• Main Authors: Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Poole, A. Desmond, Dunn, John
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1980; Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
• Subjects: Behavior Therapy - methods; empirical method of determination; Humans; interval length; Mental Disorders - psychology; Mental Disorders - rehabilitation; Psychiatric Department, Hospital; within-interval error
• ISSN: 0021-8855; 1938-3703
• DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-493

The study sought to examine the effects of varying interval length on the representation of data obtained using modified frequency time sampling. A 7‐category scale was used to observe reliably the behavior of eight psychiatric inpatients. Using electronic real time recording equipment, it was possible to computer analyze the obtained data at varying interval lengths, the shortest interval being 1.0 seconds. It was found that increasing the interval length had little effect on the percentage of total duration recorded within each behavioral category, suggesting that this is a relatively stable measure of behavior. Percentage total events for each category was less stable with increasing interval lengths. The number of recorded events within each category tended to decrease, while their average durations tended to increase, as a function of increasing the interval length. The data suggest that the current practice of determining interval length in an arbitrary fashion, or on the basis of convention, should be abandoned. Rather, such a decision should be empirically determined for each particular observation scale and subject group. One method by which this might be achieved is presented.