A reevaluation of the role of the ASIL trihelix transcription factors as repressors of the seed maturation program

Developmental transitions are typically tightly controlled at the transcriptional level. Two of these transitions involve the induction of the embryo maturation program midway through seed development and its repression during the vegetative phase of plant growth. Very little is known about the fact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant direct Vol. 5; no. 10; pp. e345 - n/a
Main Authors Ruiz, Kevin A., Pelletier, Julie M., Wang, Yuchi, Feng, Min Jun, Behr, Jacqueline S., Ðào, Thái Q., Li, Baohua, Kliebenstein, Daniel, Harada, John J., Jenik, Pablo D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.10.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Developmental transitions are typically tightly controlled at the transcriptional level. Two of these transitions involve the induction of the embryo maturation program midway through seed development and its repression during the vegetative phase of plant growth. Very little is known about the factors responsible for this regulation during early embryogenesis, and only a couple of transcription factors have been characterized as repressors during the postgerminative phase. Arabidopsis 6b‐INTERACTING PROTEIN‐LIKE1 (ASIL1), a trihelix transcription factor, has been proposed to repress maturation both embryonically and postembryonically. Preliminary data also suggested that its closest paralog, ASIL2, might play a role as well. We used a transcriptomic approach, coupled with phenotypical observations, to test the hypothesis that ASIL1 and ASIL2 redundantly turn off maturation during both phases of growth. Our results indicate that, contrary to what was previously published, neither of the ASIL genes plays a role in the regulation of maturation, at any point during plant development. Analyses of gene ontology (GO)‐enriched terms and published transcriptomic datasets suggest that these genes might be involved in responses during the vegetative phase to certain biotic and abiotic stresses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2475-4455
2475-4455
DOI:10.1002/pld3.345