Tailored Therapy in an Unselected Population of 91 Elderly Patients with DLBCL Prospectively Evaluated Using a Simplified CGA

Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Demonstrate the proper use of a simplified comprehensive geriatric analysis, including activities of daily living (ADL), Mini‐Mental State Evaluation (MMSE), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale–Geriatrics (CIRS‐G), and geriat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Vol. 17; no. 5; pp. 663 - 672
Main Authors Olivieri, Attilio, Gini, Guido, Bocci, Caterina, Montanari, Mauro, Trappolini, Silvia, Olivieri, Jacopo, Brunori, Marino, Catarini, Massimo, Guiducci, Barbara, Isidori, Alessandro, Alesiani, Francesco, Giuliodori, Luciano, Marcellini, Massimo, Visani, Giuseppe, Poloni, Antonella, Leoni, Pietro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Durham, NC, USA AlphaMed Press 01.05.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Demonstrate the proper use of a simplified comprehensive geriatric analysis, including activities of daily living (ADL), Mini‐Mental State Evaluation (MMSE), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale–Geriatrics (CIRS‐G), and geriatric syndromes (multidimensional geriatric assessment [MGA]). Maintaining a tailored anthracycline‐based therapy, describe alternative treatment in elderly diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients unfit for the standard chemotherapy. This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Background. Elderly patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are a heterogeneous population; clinical trials have evaluated a minority of these patients. Patients and Methods. Ninety‐one elderly patients with DLBCL received tailored treatment based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Three groups were identified: I, fit patients; II, patients with comorbidities; III, frail patients. Group I received 21‐day cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP‐21), group II received R‐CHOP‐21 with liposomal doxorubicin, and group III received 21‐day cycles of reduced‐dose CHOP. Fifty‐four patients (59%) were allocated to group I, 22 (25%) were allocated to group II, and 15 (16%) were allocated to group III. Results. The complete response (CR) rates were 81.5% in group I, 64% in group II, and 60% in group III. With a median follow‐up of 57 months, 42 patients are alive, with 41 in continuous CR: 31 patients (57%) in group I, seven patients (32%) in group II, and four patients (20%) in group III. The 5‐year overall survival, event‐free survival, and disease‐free survival rates in all patients were 46%, 31%, and 41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis selected group I assignment as the main significant prognostic factor for outcome. Conclusions. This approach in an unselected population of elderly DLBCL patients shows that treatment tailored according to a CGA allows the evaluation of elderly patients who are currently excluded from clinical trials. Ninety‐one elderly patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma were given tailored treatment based on the results of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Treatment was feasible with encouraging outcomes.
Bibliography:Pfizer, Amgen, Roche, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Sandoz, Abraxis, Eisai (C/A)
Disclosures
Matti Aapro
Hyman B. Muss
Arti Hurria
The authors indicated no financial relationships.
Reviewer “B”: Seattle Genetics (C/A); Cephalon, GlaxoSmithKline (RF).
Reviewer “C”: Cephalon (C/A), (RF); Amgen, Novartis, Ortho‐McNeil Janssen (H).
Section Editors
None
Amgen, Genentech, GTX (C/A); Celgene (previously Abraxis Bioscience), GlaxoSmithKline (RF).
Reviewer “A”: None
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Reviewer “C”: Cephalon (C/A), (RF); Amgen, Novartis, Ortho-McNeil Janssen (H).
Section Editors: Matti Aapro: None; Hyman B. Muss: Pfizer, Amgen, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sandoz, Abraxis, Eisai (C/A); Arti Hurria: Amgen, Genentech, GTX (C/A); Celgene (previously Abraxis Bioscience), GlaxoSmithKline (RF).
Disclosures: The authors indicated no financial relationships.
ISSN:1083-7159
1549-490X
DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0355