Revisiting the contribution of transpiration to global terrestrial evapotranspiration
Even though knowing the contributions of transpiration (T), soil and open water evaporation (E), and interception (I) to terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET = T + E + I) is crucial for understanding the hydrological cycle and its connection to ecological processes, the fraction of T is unattainable b...
Saved in:
Published in | Geophysical research letters Vol. 44; no. 6; pp. 2792 - 2801 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
28.03.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Even though knowing the contributions of transpiration (T), soil and open water evaporation (E), and interception (I) to terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET = T + E + I) is crucial for understanding the hydrological cycle and its connection to ecological processes, the fraction of T is unattainable by traditional measurement techniques over large scales. Previously reported global mean T/(E + T + I) from multiple independent sources, including satellite‐based estimations, reanalysis, land surface models, and isotopic measurements, varies substantially from 24% to 90%. Here we develop a new ET partitioning algorithm, which combines global evapotranspiration estimates and relationships between leaf area index (LAI) and T/(E + T) for different vegetation types, to upscale a wide range of published site‐scale measurements. We show that transpiration accounts for about 57.2% (with standard deviation ± 6.8%) of global terrestrial ET. Our approach bridges the scale gap between site measurements and global model simulations,and can be simply implemented into current global climate models to improve biological CO2 flux simulations.
Key Points
We develop an ET partitioning method, by combining remote sensing, land surface model, and LAI regression obtained from in situ measurements
We show that transpiration accounts for about 57.2% (with standard deviation ± 6.8%) of global terrestrial ET
Uncertainty in canopy interception loss estimation is the largest source of bias in ET partitioning |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2016GL072235 |