Coiling of lumbar epidural catheters

Background: The difficulties in threading an epidural catheter to vertebral levels remote to the puncture level have been well documented. This study was undertaken to determine the length that a single orifice epidural catheter can be threaded into the lumbar space without coiling (coiling length),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 603 - 606
Main Authors Lim, Y. J., Bahk, J. H., Ahn, W. S., Lee, S. C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 01.05.2002
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The difficulties in threading an epidural catheter to vertebral levels remote to the puncture level have been well documented. This study was undertaken to determine the length that a single orifice epidural catheter can be threaded into the lumbar space without coiling (coiling length), and whether this is affected by the direction of the epidural needle bevel. Methods: Forty‐five young male patients scheduled for surgery under epidural analgesia were enrolled. The epidural space was identified using a midline approach at the L2−3 or L3−4 interspace with the loss of resistance to air technique. A 19‐G single‐orifice epidural catheter (Flextip PlusTM, Arrow International, Inc, Reading, PA, USA) was inserted through a Tuohy needle oriented either cephalad (n=20) or caudad (n=25). During insertion, the path and the position of the catheter tip was determined by fluoroscopy using iohexol dye. Results: The median coiling length was 2.8 cm, ranging from 1.0 to 8.0 cm. Only 13% of epidural catheters could be threaded 4 cm beyond the tip of the needle without coiling. No significant difference was found in coiling length between the cephalad group (2.9 cm) and the caudad group (2.5 cm). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that coiling length is independent of whether the bevel of the Tuohy needle is directed cephalad or caudad. We recommend that an optimal insertion depth of an end‐hole single orifice catheter is 3 cm.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-R6LSXBHS-Q
ArticleID:10160
istex:9F8772F7472C18905D96C6A378332CCA5585CFEE
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-5172
1399-6576
DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460520.x