Public perspectives on COVID-19 public health and social measures in Japan and the United Kingdom: a qualitative study

• Published in: BMC public health Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 1393
• Main Authors: Kawamitsu, Saki, Win, Tin Zar, Han, Su Myat, Nakamura, Tomoka, Jogie, Melissa, Smith, Chris
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 23.05.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Analysis; Contact tracing; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - prevention & control; COVID-19 vaccines; Data collection; Disease control; England; Female; Focus Groups; Gender; Health aspects; Humans; Immunization; Industrialized nations; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pandemics - prevention & control; Policies; Policy making; Population; Public Health; Public health and social measures; Public Opinion; Public spaces; Qualitative Research; Quarantine; Rules; SARS-CoV-2; Schools; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Surveillance; Travel; Travel restrictions; United Kingdom; United Kingdom - epidemiology; Vaccination; Vaccines; Viral diseases; Work at home; Young Adult; United Kingdom; Japan; United Kingdom > UK; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Japan; England; United Kingdom; Focus groups; Pandemic preparedness; Public health and social measures
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18866-3

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, was one of the greatest modern public health crises that the world has faced. Countries undertook sweeping public health and social measures (PHSM); including environmental actions such as disinfection and ventilation; surveillance and response, such as contact tracing and quarantine; physical, such as crowd control; and restrictions on travel. This study focuses on the public perceptions of PHSM in two countries, Japan and the United Kingdom (UK) as examples of high-income countries that adopted different measures over the course of the pandemic. This study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2022, a period in which the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was predominant. Fourteen online focus group discussions were conducted in each country. Overall, 106 total participants (50 from the UK and 56 from Japan) participated in 23 focus groups (11 in the UK and 12 in Japan) with an average of three to six participants per group. Both countries were compared using a thematic analysis method. Both countries' participants agreed that vaccination was an effective measure. However, they did not favor mandatory vaccination policies. Working from home was well accepted by both sides, but they reported that schools should have continued to be opened as before COVID-19. Both sides of participants expressed that temperature testing alone in indoor facilities was ineffective as a COVID-19 control measure. There were contrasting views on face covering rules in public spaces, international and domestic movement restrictions. High acceptance of mask-wearing was reflective of Japanese customs, while it was accepted as a strong recommendation for participants in the UK. Japanese participants favored quarantine for international travel, while the UK participants supported banning non-essential travel. Similar and contrasting views on PHSM against COVID-19 between Japan and the UK demonstrated how policies in controlling an epidemic should be tailored by country with respect to its norms, cultures, economic and disease burden. Our findings may guide how policy makers can engage with the public through effective health communication and consider regulations that are aligned with the public's views and capacities in changing their behavior for future pandemic preparedness.