Clinical implications of routine genomic mutation sequencing in PIK3CA/AKT1 and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF in metastatic breast cancer

Background There is increasing interest in the molecular profiling of tumour tissues in order to investigate alternative breast cancer (BC) therapies. However, the impact of genomic screening for druggable mutations with targeted gene panel sequencing (TGPS) in routine practice remains controversial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBreast cancer research and treatment Vol. 160; no. 1; pp. 69 - 77
Main Authors Cejalvo, Juan Miguel, Pérez-Fidalgo, J. Alejandro, Ribas, Gloria, Burgués, Octavio, Mongort, Cristina, Alonso, Elisa, Ibarrola-Villava, Maider, Bermejo, Begoña, Martínez, María Teresa, Cervantes, Andrés, Lluch, Ana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.11.2016
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background There is increasing interest in the molecular profiling of tumour tissues in order to investigate alternative breast cancer (BC) therapies. However, the impact of genomic screening for druggable mutations with targeted gene panel sequencing (TGPS) in routine practice remains controversial. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of data from a genomic screening programme at our institution, in which we performed simplified TGPS for mutations in PIK3CA, AKT1, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in order to select patients for targeted therapy clinical trials. The genomes of archived samples of primary (PT) and/or metastatic (MT) tumours from advanced BC patients were analysed with MassARRAY technology (Sequenom MassARRAY, OncoCarta v1.0). The level of PTEN expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The primary endpoint was to identify the proportion of BC patients with PI3 K and MAPK alterations who were included in clinical trials using targeted therapies against these pathways. Results Two hundred and fifteen metastatic BC patients (65 PT and 168 MT) were included. Fifty-two patients (24.19 %) were enrolled in tailored clinical trials, of whom 29 (55.77, 13.49 % of all patients screened) harboured mutations targeted by the study drug. Moreover, 12 wild-type patients out of the 215 (5.58 %) were included in the clinical trials for which mutation analysis was an inclusion criteria. All the patients received drugs targeting the PI3K-AKT pathway and only two were given combinations directed against the PI3K and MAPK pathways. PI3KCA mutations were present in 33.7 % (61/181) of the patients, 45.83 % in PTs and 29.32 % in MTs. AKT1 mutations were detected in 5.48 % (8/146) of patients and PTEN loss in 34.67 % (52/150). KRAS , NRAS , and BRAF mutations were present in 12.06, 5.67, and 3.18 % of patients, respectively. Conclusions Genomic screening with a simplified TGPS is feasible, and was used to identify 13.49 % of patients who were included in clinical trials using targeted therapy against the mutations they harboured; PI3KCA mutations were the most frequent aberration in our series.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-016-3980-z