Working Memory and Its Mediating Role on the Relationship of Math Anxiety and Math Performance: A Meta-Analysis

It is well established that math anxiety has a negative relationship with math performance (MP). A few theories have provided explanations for this relationship. One of them, the Attentional Control Theory (ACT), suggests that anxiety can negatively impact the attentional control system and increase...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 798090
Main Authors Finell, Jonatan, Sammallahti, Ellen, Korhonen, Johan, Eklöf, Hanna, Jonsson, Bert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 20.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is well established that math anxiety has a negative relationship with math performance (MP). A few theories have provided explanations for this relationship. One of them, the Attentional Control Theory (ACT), suggests that anxiety can negatively impact the attentional control system and increase one's attention to threat-related stimuli. Within the ACT framework, the math anxiety (MA)-working memory (WM) relationship is argued to be critical for math performance. The present meta-analyses provides insights into the mechanisms of the MA-MP relation and the mediating role of WM. Through database searches with pre-determined search strings, 1,346 unique articles were identified. After excluding non-relevant studies, data from 57 studies and 150 effect sizes were used for investigating the MA-MP correlation using a random-effects model. This resulted in a mean correlation of = -0.168. The database search of WM as a mediator for the MA-MP relation revealed 15 effects sizes leading to a descriptive rather than a generalizable statistic, with a mean indirect effect size of -0.092. Overall, the results confirm the ACT theory, WM does play a significant role in the MA-MP relationship.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Andreas Eichler, University of Kassel, Germany
Reviewed by: Ilaria Berteletti, Gallaudet University, United States; Ann Dowker, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798090