Is chloride a conservative ion in forest ecosystems?
Chloride (Cl−) has often been assumed to be relatively unreactive in forest ecosystems, and is frequently used as a conservative tracer to calculate fluxes of water and other ions. Recently, however, several studies have detailed cycling of Cl− in vegetation and soils. In this study Cl− budgets are...
Saved in:
Published in | Biogeochemistry Vol. 107; no. 1-3; pp. 125 - 134 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer-Verlag
01.02.2012
Springer Springer Netherlands Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Chloride (Cl−) has often been assumed to be relatively unreactive in forest ecosystems, and is frequently used as a conservative tracer to calculate fluxes of water and other ions. Recently, however, several studies have detailed cycling of Cl− in vegetation and soils. In this study Cl− budgets are compiled from 32 catchment studies to determine the extent to which Cl− is conserved in the passage through forest ecosystems. Chloride budgets from these sites vary from net retention (input > output) to net release (output > input). In the overall data set, including those sites with very high inputs of seasalt Cl−, there was a strong correspondence between inputs and outputs. However, sites with low Cl− deposition (<6 kg ha−1 year−1) consistently showed net release of Cl−, suggesting an internal source or a declining internal pool. The results indicate that Cl− may be a conservative ion in sites with high Cl− deposition, but in sites with low deposition Cl− may not be conservative. We discuss the possible causes of the Cl− imbalance and reasons why Cl− may not be conservative in ecosystem functions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9538-y ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0168-2563 1573-515X 1573-515X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10533-010-9538-y |