Metabolic outcomes in a randomized trial of nucleoside, nonnucleoside and protease inhibitor-sparing regimens for initial HIV treatment

The metabolic effects of initial therapy for HIV-1 infection are important determinants of regimen selection. Open-label study in 753 subjects randomized equally to efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir(r) plus two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) vs. the NRTI-sparing regimen of lopinavi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIDS (London) Vol. 23; no. 9; pp. 1109 - 1118
Main Authors Haubrich, Richard H, Riddler, Sharon A, DiRienzo, A Gregory, Komarow, Lauren, Powderly, William G, Klingman, Karin, Garren, Kevin W, Butcher, David L, Rooney, James F, Haas, David W, Mellors, John W, Havlir, Diane V
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.06.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The metabolic effects of initial therapy for HIV-1 infection are important determinants of regimen selection. Open-label study in 753 subjects randomized equally to efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir(r) plus two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) vs. the NRTI-sparing regimen of lopinavir/r plus efavirenz. Zidovudine, stavudine, or tenofovir with lamivudine was selected prior to randomization. Metabolic outcomes through 96 weeks were lipoatrophy, defined as at least 20% loss in extremity fat, and fasting serum lipids. Lipoatrophy by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at week 96 occurred in 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25-39%] of subjects in the efavirenz plus two NRTIs arm, 17% (95% CI 12-24) in the lopinavir/r plus two NRTIs arm, and 9% (95% CI 5-14) in the NRTI-sparing arm (P < or = 0.023 for all comparisons). Varying the definition of lipoatrophy (> or =10 to > or =40% fat loss) and correction for baseline risk factors did not affect the significant difference in lipoatrophy between the NRTI-containing regimens. Lipoatrophy was most frequent with stavudine-containing regimens and least frequent with tenofovir-containing regimens (P < 0.001), which were not significantly different from the NRTI-sparing regimen. Total cholesterol increases at week 96 were greatest in the NRTI-sparing arm (median +57 mg/dl) compared with the other two arms (+32-33 mg/dl; P < 0.001). Use of lipid-lowering agents was more common (25 vs. 11-13%) in the NRTI-sparing arm. Lipoatrophy was more frequent with efavirenz than lopinavir/r when combined with stavudine or zidovudine, and less frequent when either drug was combined with tenofovir. Lipoatrophy was least frequent with the NRTI-sparing regimen, but this benefit was offset by greater cholesterol elevations and the need for lipid-lowering agents.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Drs. Haubrich and Riddler contributed equally to this article.
ISSN:0269-9370
1473-5571
1473-5571
DOI:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832b4377