The Effects of Working Memory Load on Auditory Distraction in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

• Published in: Frontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 15; p. 771711
• Main Authors: Blomberg, Rina, Johansson Capusan, Andrea, Signoret, Carine, Danielsson, Henrik, Rönnberg, Jerker
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 30.11.2021
• Subjects: adults; attention; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; auditory distraction; cognitive control; Neuroscience; salience network (SN); task-based fMRI; auditory distraction; cognitive control; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; working memory; adults; attention; salience network (SN)
• ISSN: 1662-5161; 1662-5161
• DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.771711

Cognitive control provides us with the ability to , regulate the locus of attention and ignore environmental distractions in accordance with our goals. Auditory distraction is a frequently cited symptom in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (aADHD)-yet few task-based fMRI studies have explored whether deficits in cognitive control (associated with the disorder) impedes on the ability to suppress/compensate for exogenously evoked cortical responses to noise in this population. In the current study, we explored the effects of auditory distraction as function of working memory (WM) load. Participants completed two tasks: an auditory target detection (ATD) task in which the goal was to actively detect salient oddball tones amidst a stream of standard tones in noise, and a visual -back task consisting of 0-, 1-, and 2-back WM conditions whilst concurrently ignoring the same tonal signal from the ATD task. Results indicated that our sample of young aADHD ( = 17), compared to typically developed controls ( = 17), had difficulty attenuating auditory cortical responses to the task-irrelevant sound when WM demands were high (2-back). Heightened auditory activity to task-irrelevant sound was associated with both poorer WM performance and symptomatic inattentiveness. In the ATD task, we observed a significant increase in functional communications between auditory and salience networks in aADHD. Because performance outcomes were on par with controls for this task, we suggest that this increased functional connectivity in aADHD was likely an adaptive mechanism for suboptimal listening conditions. Taken together, our results indicate that aADHD are more susceptible to noise interference when they are engaged in a primary task. The ability to cope with auditory distraction appears to be related to the WM demands of the task and thus the capacity to deploy cognitive control.