Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimator of mycophenolic acid in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • MMF has been proposed as a treatment of steroid‐dependent nephrotic syndrome and in the recent years, several studies have suggested its positive effect in preventing relapses. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS • The population pharmacokinetics of MPA was first evaluate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 69; no. 4; pp. 358 - 366
Main Authors Zhao, Wei, Elie, Valéry, Baudouin, Véronique, Bensman, Albert, André, Jean Luc, Brochard, Karine, Broux, Françoise, Cailliez, Mathilde, Loirat, Chantal, Jacqz‐Aigrain, Evelyne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2010
Blackwell
Blackwell Science Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0306-5251
1365-2125
1365-2125
DOI10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03615.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • MMF has been proposed as a treatment of steroid‐dependent nephrotic syndrome and in the recent years, several studies have suggested its positive effect in preventing relapses. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS • The population pharmacokinetics of MPA was first evaluated in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and data fitted well with a two‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and lag time. • Body weight and serum albumin had a significant impact on oral clearance. • A three‐point (T0, T1 and T4h) Bayesian estimator of AUC0–12 was developed. AIMS To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for mycophenolic acid (MPA) in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), identify covariates that explain variability and determine the Bayesian estimator of the area under the concentration–time curve over 12 h (AUC0–12). METHODS The pharmacokinetic model of MMF was described from 23 patients aged 7.4 ± 3.9 years (range 2.9–14.9) using nonlinear mixed‐effects modelling (NONMEM) software. A two‐compartment model with lag–time and first‐order absorption and elimination was developed. The final model was validated using visual predictive check. Bayesian estimator was validated using circular permutation method. RESULTS The population pharmacokinetic parameters were apparent oral clearance 9.7 l h−1, apparent central volume of distribution 22.3 l, apparent peripheral volume of distribution 250 l, inter‐compartment clearance 18.8 l h−1, absorption rate constant 5.16 h−1, lag time 0.215 h. The covariate analysis identified body weight and serum albumin as individual factors influencing the apparent oral clearance. Accurate Bayesian estimation of AUC0–12 was obtained using the combination of three MPA concentrations measured just before (T0), 1 and 4 h (T1 and T4) after drug intake with a small error of 0.298 µg h−1 ml−1 between estimated and reference AUC0–12. CONCLUSIONS The population pharmacokinetic model of MPA was developed in children with INS. A three‐point (T0, T1 and T4h) Bayesian estimator of AUC0–12 was developed and might be used to investigate the relation between MPA pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics in children with INS and determine if there is any indication to monitor MPA exposure in order to improve patient outcome based on individual AUC‐controlled MMF dosing.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03615.x