The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective

• Published in: Third world quarterly Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 1 - 21
• Main Author: Robinson, William I.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Routledge 02.01.2015; Routledge Journals; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Agricultural subsidies; BRICS; Capitalism; China; Class Formation; Contracts; global capitalism; imperialism/sub-imperialism; Intellectuals; International Cooperation; International economic relations; International Economics; International relations-US; International Trade; Nation state; North-South; Paradigms; Political economy; Political Power; Risk; Social Integration; State; Subsidies; Trade agreements; transnational capitalist class; transnational state; Transnationalism; U.S.A; Working Class; World Economy; United States > US; BRICS countries
• ISSN: 0143-6597; 1360-2241
• DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.976012

It is commonplace for observers to see the increasingly prominent role of the BRICS in international economic and political affairs as a Southern challenge to global capitalism and the power of the core Trilateral nation-states. Extant accounts remain mired in a tenacious realist debate over the extent to which the BRICS are challenging the prevailing international order. I suggest that we shift the paradigmatic focus in discussion of the BRICS phenomenon towards a global capitalism perspective that breaks with such a nation-state/inter-state framework. Global integration and transnational capitalist class formation has advanced significantly in the BRICS. BRICS protagonism is aimed less at challenging the prevailing international order than at opening up space in the global system for more extensive integration and a less asymmetric global capitalism. The article examines agricultural subsidies, US-China relations and international trade agreements as empirical reference points in arguing that the concept of the transnational state provides a more satisfying explanatory framework for understanding the BRICS phenomenon than the variety of realist approaches. By misreading the BRICS critical scholars and the global left run the risk of becoming cheerleaders for repressive states and transnational capitalists in the South. We would be better off by a denouement of the BRICS states and siding with 'BRICS from below' struggles of popular and working class forces.